Here are a couple quick tips to keep your home in working condition;
Stayed tuned for more great tips on summer maintenance!!!
![]() |
| Written by Geneviève St-Denis, Rhodes & Williams Insurance |
![]() |
| Written by Geneviève St-Denis, Rhodes & Williams Insurance |
![]() |
| Written By Lorne Wiebe, Rhodes & Williams Account Executive. Photo credit: ourhometown.ca |
![]() |
| Written by Geneviève St-Denis, Account Executive, Rhodes & Williams |
Written by Geneviève St-Denis, Account Executive, Rhodes & Williams Insurance Brokers
Although basic tenants, condo or homeowners insurance might include a limited amount of coverage for jewelry, the coverage is best purchased as an extension, or floater, to your property policy. A current appraisal is often a requirement however this is something that is commonly provided by the jeweler at the time of purchase.
Written by Geneviève St-Denis, Account Executive, Rhodes & Williams| The photo above is a Shih-Tzu; the same breed that is responsible for the attack of the Home Depot Associate. Regardless of the size, any dog can be dangerous. |
| This is an example of some of the flooding that resulted from Sandy. |
A few days ago I was sitting at a local coffee shop and watched a young lady come in with her laptop. She sat down at the table, connected her laptop to the free wireless network, and proceeded to log into her online bank account. I remember thinking at the time, "That is a dangerous practice."
![]() | ||
|
Battles between insurance brokers and the banks are nothing new. Current legislations states that banks can only promote insurance “outside of a branch”. Restrictions have been in place against banks for a very long time and for very good reason.
At issue this time is that the banks’ current attempts at expansion into insurance is a violation of the spirit of the legislation set up by the federal government in 1991. Obviously the government sees the need for such regulation since time and time again, the banks have tried to get them to reverse it, but it simply isn’t the right thing for the customer. A couple of the strongest reasons against banks retailing insurance in their branches are:
There are many more reasons, but this is not a rant about why banks should not be allowed to retail insurance from their branches … that has already been looked at time-and-time again and the federal government recognizes that it is not the right thing for the consumer.
This is a discussion on what constitutes a bank branch. I can’t comment for all bank customers, but I personally can’t think of the last time I visited a teller in a branch, for my banking needs. The majority of my banking is done at bank machines, or in most situations, over the Internet. Logic would state that those bank machines and websites for banking purposes would be considered a “bank branch”. The same logic for protecting the consumer would apply to these “locations” just as much as they would standard bank branches, which is where most transactions took place when this legislation was written. It's really during the credit application process that consumers are most vulnerable and open to coercion. And as it turns out, you can also apply for credit on-line. Therefore the same threats to consumers exist whether it's in a branch or on-line. Times have changed and it appears that the banks are once again trying to skirt the rules and intent of the legislation by using the Internet, and not considering it a bank branch. What about the virtual banks that now exist? They don’t have “bricks and mortar” branches. Does that somehow make it any more acceptable for them to use unfair competitive advantages and potential tied-selling to the detriment of the consumer?
I sure hope the government decides to put an end to this skirting of the spirit and intent of the law to protect consumers. The same sound logic for not allowing banks to retail insurance products from their bricks and mortar branches applies to their virtual branches as well. Please enforce the intent of the law, or if need be, amend the law to avoid this loop-hole.
So as mentioned, every situation is unique, so give us a call to make sure.
Of note, one of the recommendations put forth in the Report on the Five Year Review of Automobile Insurance, presented to the Financial Services Commission of Ontario is as follows:
"The superintendent intends to amend the OAP 1 to provide a limited amount of coverage for vehicles with a GVWR over 4,500 kg's."
This is just a recommendation and has not been adopted, so ensure you are properly covered.